Danley v. Danley

82 So. 2d 534, 263 Ala. 390, 1955 Ala. LEXIS 632
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedSeptember 22, 1955
Docket4 Div. 788
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 82 So. 2d 534 (Danley v. Danley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Danley v. Danley, 82 So. 2d 534, 263 Ala. 390, 1955 Ala. LEXIS 632 (Ala. 1955).

Opinion

MAYFIELD, Justice.

This is an appeal from a decree of the Circuit Cou'rt of 'Coffee. County, Alabama, in equity, sustaining appellees’ demurrer to appellant’s bill of complaint.

The cause was submitted to this court on the correctness of the trial court’s ruling on demurrer and the appellees’ motion to dismiss the appeal.

Title 7, Section 755, Code of Alabama 1940, provides that appeals from interlocutory decrees- in equity must be taken in thirty days.

The decree on demurrer, which is the subject of .this appeal, was rendered on 12 December 1953. Notice of appeal was given on 9 January 1954. However, security for the costs of the appeal was not filed with nor approved by the register until 3 April 1954. It, therefore, affirmatively appears from the record that this appeal was not taken within the thirty days allowed for such appeals.

- Title 7, Section 766, Code of Alabama 1940, provides:

“Any appeal taken under the provisions of this chapter from the rendition of the judgment or decree, shall be shown in the following manner: * * * (b) By giving security for the costs of the appeal to be approved [391]*391by the clerk or register, or court. * *

The decisions of this court are uniform to the effect that the appeal dates from the proper filing of security of costs. See Liverpool & London & Globe Ins. Co. v. Lowe, 208 Ala. 12, 93 So. 765; Lewis v. Martin, 210 Ala. 401, 98 So. 635; Jacobs v. Goodwater Graphite Co., 205 Ala. 112, 87 So. 363; Peters v. Chas. Schuessler & Sons, 208 Ala. 627, 95 So. 26.

We are bound by the statute and the above decisions, and we have no recourse other than to dismiss the appeal. The appellant is granted thirty days in which to plead further.

Appeal dismissed.

LIVINGSTON, C. J., and SIMPSON and GOODWYN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Evers v. Union Camp Corporation
310 So. 2d 870 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1975)
McCulley v. Stroud
243 So. 2d 28 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1970)
Jones v. Shoemaker
237 So. 2d 103 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1970)
Cooper v. Acuff
233 So. 2d 223 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1970)
Gray v. State Ex Rel. Attorney General
185 So. 2d 125 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1965)
Anderson v. Anderson
119 So. 2d 31 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1960)
Ridgeway v. Lovelady
108 So. 2d 459 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1958)
Lloyd's of London v. Fidelity Securities Corp.
105 So. 2d 728 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1958)
Town of Vernon v. Maddox Motor Company
92 So. 2d 920 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1957)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
82 So. 2d 534, 263 Ala. 390, 1955 Ala. LEXIS 632, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/danley-v-danley-ala-1955.