Danks v. Quackenbush
3 Denio 594
Opinion
The cause having been argued by counsel, and time having been taken for deliberation, the judgment of the supreme court was affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Danks v. Quackenbush, 3 Denio 594 (N.Y. 1848).
3 Denio 594 (Danks v. Quackenbush) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In Re the Transfer Tax Upon the Estate of Pell
63 N.E. 789 (New York Court of Appeals, 1902)
Savage v. City of Buffalo
14 N.Y.S. 101 (New York Supreme Court, 1891)
People, Ex Rel. Collins v. . Spicer
1 N.E. 680 (New York Court of Appeals, 1885)
Deering v. Boyle
8 Kan. 525 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1871)
Hill v. . Kessler
63 N.C. 437 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1869)