Danker v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America

243 A.D. 527
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 15, 1934·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment of the City Court of Yonkers and order denying motion to set aside verdict and for a new trial reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial ordered, costs to appellant to abide the event. The trial court correctly charged that the plaintiff “ must show affirmatively by a fair preponderance of the evidence that upon the date of the issuance of the policy the insured was in sound health.” (Battah v. Prudential Insurance Co., 151 Misc. 176; Goodfriend v. American Credit Indemnity Co., 217 App. Div. 635, 638; Lee v. Prudential Life Insurance Co., 203 Mass. 299, 301; Greenbaum v. Columbian Nat. Life Ins. Co. of Boston, 62 F. [2d] 56, 58.) We are of'opinion that plaintiff’s case failed to bear the burden of proof imposed upon him by law. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Seudder and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Danker v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America, 243 A.D. 527 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

243 A.D. 527 (Danker v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bomwell v. Commercial Casualty Insurance
243 A.D. 539 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1934)