Dankenbring v. Fitzhugh
467 So. 2d 828, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1071, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13686
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 26, 1985·No. No. 84-239·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Appellant appeals the summary judgment entered against her in her personal injury action against appellees. Appellant was employed to maintain the yard of ap-pellees, the Fitzhughes. She was injured when her leg slipped into a void in the soil underneath the sod of the yard. We affirm on the authority of Hughes v. Roarin 20’s, Inc., 455 So.2d 422 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); Cassel v. Price, 396 So.2d 258 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); Ayala v. Fields, 390 So.2d 166 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dankenbring v. Fitzhugh, 467 So. 2d 828, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1071, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13686 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).
467 So. 2d 828 (Dankenbring v. Fitzhugh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
White v. Patterson
479 So. 2d 860 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)