Dankenbring v. Fitzhugh

467 So. 2d 828, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1071, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13686
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 26, 1985
DocketNo. 84-239
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 467 So. 2d 828 (Dankenbring v. Fitzhugh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dankenbring v. Fitzhugh, 467 So. 2d 828, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1071, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13686 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals the summary judgment entered against her in her personal injury action against appellees. Appellant was employed to maintain the yard of ap-pellees, the Fitzhughes. She was injured when her leg slipped into a void in the soil underneath the sod of the yard. We affirm on the authority of Hughes v. Roarin 20’s, Inc., 455 So.2d 422 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); Cassel v. Price, 396 So.2d 258 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); Ayala v. Fields, 390 So.2d 166 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980).

OTT, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and SCHOONOVER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

White v. Patterson
479 So. 2d 860 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
467 So. 2d 828, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1071, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13686, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dankenbring-v-fitzhugh-fladistctapp-1985.