Dankelman v. Dankelman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Dankelman v. Dankelman

209 A.D.2d 575, 619 N.Y.S.2d 648, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11525

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 21, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 209 A.D.2d 575 (Dankelman v. Dankelman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dankelman v. Dankelman, 209 A.D.2d 575, 619 N.Y.S.2d 648, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11525 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the husband and cross appeal by the wife, as limited by their briefs, from stated portions of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Hillery, J.), dated November 25,1992.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements, for reasons stated by Justice Hillery at the Supreme Court. Miller, J. P., O’Brien, Joy and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the husband and cross appeal by the wife, as limited by their briefs, from stated portions of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Hillery, J.), dated November 25,1992.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements, for reasons stated by Justice Hillery at the Supreme Court. Miller, J. P., O’Brien, Joy and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

209 A.D.2d 575, 619 N.Y.S.2d 648, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11525, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dankelman-v-dankelman-nyappdiv-1994.