Dankberg v. Spuches
297 A.D.2d 254, 746 N.Y.2d 596
Opinion
[255] Upon review of the record, we find that petitioners met their burden under Election Law § 16-110 (2). While not in itself determinative, we note that appellant initially filed to change his party registration. Concur — Saxe, J.P., Friedman and Gonzalez, JJ.
Buckley and Marlow, JJ., dissent in a memorandum by Buckley, J., as follows: Based upon our review of the evidence and the law, we conclude that petitioners failed to meet their burden under Election Law § 16-110 (2).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dankberg v. Spuches, 297 A.D.2d 254, 746 N.Y.2d 596 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).
297 A.D.2d 254 (Dankberg v. Spuches) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
§ 16-110
New York ELN § 16-110(2)