Dankberg v. Spuches
778 N.E.2d 545, 98 N.Y.2d 706
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, without costs (see, Matter of Rivera v Espada, 98 NY2d 422 [decided today]). Spuches’ remaining contention that the New York City Board of Elections improperly invalidated his designating petition is without merit.
Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Smith, Levine, Ciparick, Wesley and Graffeo. Taking no part: Judge Rosenblatt.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dankberg v. Spuches, 778 N.E.2d 545, 98 N.Y.2d 706 (N.Y. 2002).
778 N.E.2d 545 (Dankberg v. Spuches) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
MATTER OF RIVERA v. Espada
777 N.E.2d 235 (New York Court of Appeals, 2002)