Danitta Morton v. Najarian Capital, LLC

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 11, 2019
DocketA19D0295
StatusPublished

This text of Danitta Morton v. Najarian Capital, LLC (Danitta Morton v. Najarian Capital, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Danitta Morton v. Najarian Capital, LLC, (Ga. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ February 07, 2019

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A19D0295. DANITTA MORTON et al. v. NAJARIAN CAPITAL, LLC.

This dispossessory proceeding originated in magistrate court.1 Following an adverse ruling, the magistrate court issued a writ of possession, and Danitta Morton and Anthony Ross filed this application. “The only avenue of appeal available from [a] magistrate court judgment is provided by OCGA § 15-10-41 (b) (1), which allows for a de novo appeal to the state or superior court.” Handler v. Hulsey, 199 Ga. App. 751, 751 (406 SE2d 225) (1991). Thus, this Court may address magistrate court matters only if they already have been reviewed by the state or superior court. See Westwind Corp. v. Washington Fed. S & L Assn., 195 Ga. App. 411, 411 (1) (393 SE2d 479) (1990). Nothing in the application materials shows that the magistrate court’s order has been reviewed by a state or superior court.

1 The case was later transferred to superior court to be consolidated with an action pending there. Ultimately, however, the superior court action was dismissed, and the matter was transferred back to magistrate court. Accordingly, this application is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 02/07/2019 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Westwind Corporation v. Washington Federal Savings & Loan Association
393 S.E.2d 479 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1990)
Handler v. Hulsey
406 S.E.2d 225 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Danitta Morton v. Najarian Capital, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/danitta-morton-v-najarian-capital-llc-gactapp-2019.