Danis-Shook v. Secretary of Labor

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided February 20, 2003·No. 01-4038·Published

Opinion

5(&200(1'(' )25 )8//7(;7 38%/,&$7,21 3XUVXDQW WR 6L[WK &LUFXLW 5XOH 

(/(&7521,& &,7$7,21  )(' $SS 3 WK &LU )LOH 1DPH DS

81,7('67$7(6&28572)$33($/6 )257+(6,;7+&,5&8,7 BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB

'$1,66+22. s2,17 ; 9(1785( ;;9  3HWLWLRQHU   1R  Y !   6(&5(7$5< 2) /$%25  5HVSRQGHQW   1 2Q$SSHDOIURPD'HFLVLRQDQG2UGHURI WKH2FFXSDWLRQDO6DIHW\DQG+HDOWK5HYLHZ&RPPLVVLRQ 1R $UJXHGsDQXDU\ 'HFLGHGDQG)LOHG)HEUXDU\ %HIRUH0$57,1&KLHI&LUFXLWsXGJH0(55,77DQG /$<&LUFXLWsXGJHV BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB &2816(/ $5*8('  *DU\ : $XPDQ '81/(9(< 0$+$1 )855<'D\WRQ2KLRIRU3HWLWLRQHU5RQDOGs*RWWOLHE

7KH +RQRUDEOH 'RQDOG 3 /D\ &LUFXLW sXGJH RI WKH 8QLWHG 6WDWHV &RXUW RI $SSHDOV IRU WKH (LJKWK &LUFXLW VLWWLQJ E\ GHVLJQDWLRQ

  'DQLV6KRRNsRLQW9HQWXUH 1R 1R 'DQLV6KRRNsRLQW9HQWXUH  Y6HFUHWDU\RI/DERU Y6HFUHWDU\RI/DERU

81,7('67$7(6'(3$570(172)/$%252)),&( DVVHUWVWKDW'DQLV6KRRNGLGQRWHQIRUFHLWVSROLF\DVZULWWHQ 2)7+(62/,&,725:DVKLQJWRQ'&IRU5HVSRQGHQW 7KHZULWWHQVDIHW\SROLF\UHTXLUHGKD]DUGVQRWFRYHUHGWREH 21%5,()*DU\:$XPDQ'81/(9(<0$+$1 UHSRUWHGVRWKDWFKDQJHVFRXOGEHPDGHLQWKHSURJUDP7KH )855<'D\WRQ2KLRIRU3HWLWLRQHU5RQDOGs*RWWOLHE 'DQLV6KRRNVXSHUYLVRUZKRRYHUVDZWKHIRUHPHQGLGQRW $QQ 5RVHQWKDO 81,7(' 67$7(6 '(3$570(17 2) UHTXLUHWKHIRUHPHQWRUHSRUWDKD]DUGLIWKH\WKRXJKWWKH\ /$%252)),&(2)7+(62/,&,725:DVKLQJWRQ'& FRXOGDGGUHVVLWHIIHFWLYHO\WKHPVHOYHV)LQDOO\WKHUHZDVQR IRU5HVSRQGHQW ZRUNUXOHWKDWVSHFLILFDOO\UHTXLUHG:DJQHUWRZHDUSHUVRQDO SURWHFWLYHHTXLSPHQWZKHQHQWHULQJDFFXPXODWHGZDWHULQWKH BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB EDVLQV:KLOH'DQLV6KRRNQHHGQRWKDYHDUXOHVRVSHFLILF LW FRXOG DQG VKRXOG KDYH UHTXLUHG WKDW LWV HPSOR\HHV ZHDU 23,1,21 OLIHOLQHVKDUQHVVHVDQGYHVWVZKHQHYHUWKHUHZDVDGDQJHURI BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB HQJXOIPHQW  7KH 'DQLV6KRRN UXOH RQ SHUVRQDO SURWHFWLYH HTXLSPHQWZDVGLVFUHWLRQDU\DQGQRWPDQGDWRU\DQGWKLVZDV %2<&()0$57,1s5&KLHI&LUFXLWs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†  E   LQ IDLOLQJ WR LQVWUXFW HPSOR\HHVLQWKHUHFRJQLWLRQDQGDYRLGDQFHRIWKHKD]DUGV DVVRFLDWHG ZLWK HQWHULQJ D EDVLQ ILOOHG ZLWK DFFXPXODWHG ZDWHU6HFRQGWKH&RPPLVVLRQIRXQGWKDW'DQLV6KRRNKDG NQRZOHGJH RI WKH IDLOXUH RI LWV HPSOR\HH WR XVH SHUVRQDO SURWHFWLYHHTXLSPHQWLQYLRODWLRQRI&)5† D  DQG 'DQLV6KRRNjV XQSUHYHQWDEOH VXSHUYLVRU\ PLVFRQGXFW GHIHQVHIDLOHG,QHVVHQFHWKH5HYLHZ&RPPLVVLRQIRXQG WKDW'DQLV6KRRNPDGHVRPHHIIRUWVWRLQVXUHVDIHW\EXWWKDW LWVHQIRUFHPHQWRIVDIHW\UXOHVZDVQRWVXIILFLHQWO\DJJUHVVLYH DQGLWVVDIHW\LQVWUXFWLRQVQRWFOHDUDQGGHILQLWH ,Q$SULORI'DQLV,QGXVWULHVDQG6KRRN,QFHQWHUHG LQWR D MRLQW YHQWXUH IRU WKH H[SDQVLRQ RI WKH %HDYHUFUHHN ZDVWHZDWHUWUHDWPHQWSODQWLQ2KLR$VSDUWRIWKHH[SDQVLRQ  'DQLV6KRRNsRLQW9HQWXUH 1R 1R 'DQLV6KRRNsRLQW9HQWXUH  Y6HFUHWDU\RI/DERU Y6HFUHWDU\RI/DERU

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Danis-Shook v. Secretary of Labor, (6th Cir. 2003).

Danis-Shook v. Secretary of Labor (Danis-Shook v. Secretary of Labor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.