Daniman v. Board of Education

352 U.S. 950, 77 S. Ct. 324
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Daniman v. Board of Education. Read the opinion of the Court — 348 U.S. 933
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided December 17, 1956·No. No. 385; No. 378·Published

Opinion

The motion for leave to file petition for rehearing and for incidental relief is denied. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The motion for leave to use the record in No. 385, October Term, 1954, Daniman v. Board of Education, 348 U. S. 933, is granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of New York denied.

The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas would grant the rehearing in accordance with the action taken in Cahill v. New York, New Haven & Hartford R. Co., 351 U. S. 183. Mr. Justice Brennan took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.

Reported below: See 1 N. Y. 2d 855, 135 N. E. 2d 732.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Daniman v. Board of Education, 352 U.S. 950, 77 S. Ct. 324 (1956).

352 U.S. 950 (Daniman v. Board of Education) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cahill v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad
351 U.S. 183 (Supreme Court, 1956)
N. H. Lyons & Co. v. Corsi
135 N.E.2d 732 (New York Court of Appeals, 1956)
Daniman v. Board of Education
348 U.S. 933 (Supreme Court, 1955)