Daniman v. Board of Education

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Daniman v. Board of Education

282 A.D. 717, 122 N.Y.S.2d 905, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4783

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1953

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 282 A.D. 717 (Daniman v. Board of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Daniman v. Board of Education, 282 A.D. 717, 122 N.Y.S.2d 905, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4783 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1953).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal in an article 78 proceeding by eight petitioners (teachers in elementary, junior high, and high schools of the city of New York) from an order denying their application to annul a resolution, dated October 2, 1952, of respondent board of education terminating the employment of six of the petitioners, and a similar resolution, dated October 23, 1952, terminating the employment of the remaining two petitioners, all pursuant to section 903 of the New York City Charter. Order affirmed, without costs. See Matter of Shlahman v. Board of Higher Educ. of City of N. T. (282 App, Div. 718), decided herewith. Adel, Schmidt and Beldoek, JJ., concur; Nolan, P. J., and Wenzel, J., dissent and vote to reverse the order and to grant the application for the reasons set forth in their dissenting memorandum in Matter of Shlakman v. Board of Higher Educ. of City of N. Y. (282 App. Div. 718). [202 Misc. 915.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal in an article 78 proceeding by eight petitioners (teachers in elementary, junior high, and high schools of the city of New York) from an order denying their application to annul a resolution, dated October 2, 1952, of respondent board of education terminating the employment of six of the petitioners, and a similar resolution, dated October 23, 1952, terminating the employment of the remaining two petitioners, all pursuant to section 903 of the New York City Charter. Order affirmed, without costs. See Matter of Shlahman v. Board of Higher Educ. of City of N. T. (282 App, Div. 718), decided herewith. Adel, Schmidt and Beldoek, JJ., concur; Nolan, P. J., and Wenzel, J., dissent and vote to reverse the order and to grant the application for the reasons set forth in their dissenting memorandum in Matter of Shlakman v. Board of Higher Educ. of City of N. Y. (282 App. Div. 718). [202 Misc. 915.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

282 A.D. 717, 122 N.Y.S.2d 905, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4783, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniman-v-board-of-education-nyappdiv-1953.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack