Daniman v. Board of Education

138 N.E.2d 720, 2 N.Y.2d 719
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Daniman v. Board of Education. Read the opinion of the Court — 306 N.Y. 532
New York Court of Appeals·Decided October 4, 1956·Published

Opinion

Motion by appellant Sloehower to amend the remittitur in the second above-entitled proceeding to conform to the mandate of the Supreme Court of the United States granted. Return o!f remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended to provide as follows: Order of Appellate Division and that of Special Term reversed, with costs in all courts, and matter remitted to Special Term for the purpose of granting to appellant Sloehower the relief prayed for in his petition. In computing the sums due appellant, Special Term may deduct the amount of any compensation received by appellant since October 3, 1952. This remission is without prejudice to any inquiry or proceedings which respondent is presently taking or hereafter may take against appellant. [See 306 N. Y. 532; 350 U. S. 551.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Daniman v. Board of Education, 138 N.E.2d 720, 2 N.Y.2d 719 (N.Y. 1956).

138 N.E.2d 720 (Daniman v. Board of Education) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Slochower v. Board of Higher Ed. of New York City
350 U.S. 551 (Supreme Court, 1956)
Daniman v. Board of Education
119 N.E.2d 373 (New York Court of Appeals, 1954)