Danielson v. Danielson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Danielson v. Danielson

140 A.D.2d 407, 528 N.Y.S.2d 341, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4928

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 9, 1988·Published

Opinion

[408] Contrary to the defendant’s position, the Supreme Court was without jurisdiction to direct the specific performance of a contract of sale between the parties with regard to the marital residence, which contract was executed subsequent to the parties’ judgment of divorce. In order to seek enforcement of that contract, the defendant must institute a separate action for specific performance against the plaintiff. Mollen, P. J., Thompson, Rubin and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[408] Contrary to the defendant’s position, the Supreme Court was without jurisdiction to direct the specific performance of a contract of sale between the parties with regard to the marital residence, which contract was executed subsequent to the parties’ judgment of divorce. In order to seek enforcement of that contract, the defendant must institute a separate action for specific performance against the plaintiff. Mollen, P. J., Thompson, Rubin and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Danielson v. Danielson, 140 A.D.2d 407, 528 N.Y.S.2d 341, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4928 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

140 A.D.2d 407 (Danielson v. Danielson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.