Danielson v. Cardoza
This text of Danielson v. Cardoza (Danielson v. Cardoza) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX 27-FEB-2020 02:01 PM
SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
SCOTT DANIELSON, Petitioner, vs.
THE HONORABLE JOSEPH E. CARDOZA,1 Judge of the Circuit Court of the Second Circuit, State of Hawai#i, Respondent Judge,
and
STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (S.P.P. 14-1-0002)
ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)
Upon consideration of petitioner Scott Danielson’s
petition for writ of mandamus, filed on January 13, 2020, the
respondent judge’s response to the petition for writ of mandamus,
filed on February 12, 2020, the respective supporting documents,
and the record, it appears that the circuit court disposed of
petitioner’s HRPP Rule 40 petition for post-conviction relief
pursuant to its “Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and
Order”, filed on January 15, 2020. Petitioner’s request for
1 The Honorable Joseph E. Cardoza retired in June 2019. The Honorable Kelsey T. Kawano was appointed to fill the vacancy created by Judge Cardoza’s retirement. mandamus relief from this court is therefore moot. Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for writ of
mandamus is dismissed as moot.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, February 27, 2020.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Richard W. Pollack
/s/ Michael D. Wilson
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Danielson v. Cardoza, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/danielson-v-cardoza-haw-2020.