Daniels v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
763 A.2d 369, 563 Pa. 552, 2000 Pa. LEXIS 2910
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 29, 2000·No. Petition No. 384 E.D. Alloc. Dkt. 2000·Published·Cited by 5 cases
Opinion
[553] ORDER
AND NOW, this 29th day of November, 2000, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED to the following issue:
Whether the WCAB and the Commonwealth Court erred in affirming the termination of petitioner’s disability benefits because the WCJ failed to adequately explain on the record why she rejected conflicting, competent medical evidence pursuant to section 422(a) of the Workers’ Compensation Act?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Daniels v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board, 763 A.2d 369, 563 Pa. 552, 2000 Pa. LEXIS 2910 (Pa. 2000).
763 A.2d 369 (Daniels v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
823 A.2d 209 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2003)
Reinert v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
816 A.2d 403 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2003)
CPV Manufacturing, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
805 A.2d 653 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2002)
Sewell v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
772 A.2d 93 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2001)