Daniels v. Steinmetz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Daniels v. Steinmetz

241 A.D. 698

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 15, 1934·Published

Opinion

Order denying motion for judgment on the pleadings under rule 112 of the Rules of Civil Practice, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper and Tompkins, JJ., concur; Davis, J., concurs on the ground that whatever remedy appellant had was under rule 102 of the Rules of Civil Practice, and not under rule 112. No grounds for dismissal based on the latter rule were presented in the motion papers.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying motion for judgment on the pleadings under rule 112 of the Rules of Civil Practice, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper and Tompkins, JJ., concur; Davis, J., concurs on the ground that whatever remedy appellant had was under rule 102 of the Rules of Civil Practice, and not under rule 112. No grounds for dismissal based on the latter rule were presented in the motion papers.

Daniels v. Steinmetz, 241 A.D. 698 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

241 A.D. 698 (Daniels v. Steinmetz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.