Daniels v. Steinmetz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Daniels v. Steinmetz

241 A.D. 698

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 15, 1934

StatusPublished

This text of 241 A.D. 698 (Daniels v. Steinmetz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Daniels v. Steinmetz, 241 A.D. 698 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

Order denying motion for judgment on the pleadings under rule 112 of the Rules of Civil Practice, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper and Tompkins, JJ., concur; Davis, J., concurs on the ground that whatever remedy appellant had was under rule 102 of the Rules of Civil Practice, and not under rule 112. No grounds for dismissal based on the latter rule were presented in the motion papers.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying motion for judgment on the pleadings under rule 112 of the Rules of Civil Practice, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper and Tompkins, JJ., concur; Davis, J., concurs on the ground that whatever remedy appellant had was under rule 102 of the Rules of Civil Practice, and not under rule 112. No grounds for dismissal based on the latter rule were presented in the motion papers.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

241 A.D. 698, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniels-v-steinmetz-nyappdiv-1934.