Daniels v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Daniels v. State

551 S.W.3d 110

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 24, 2018

DocketNo. ED 105432

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 551 S.W.3d 110 (Daniels v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Daniels v. State, 551 S.W.3d 110 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jeryl Daniels appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Jeryl Daniels appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

551 S.W.3d 110, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniels-v-state-moctapp-2018.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack