Daniels v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Daniels v. State

551 S.W.3d 110

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 24, 2018·No. No. ED 105432·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jeryl Daniels appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Jeryl Daniels appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Daniels v. State, 551 S.W.3d 110 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

551 S.W.3d 110 (Daniels v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related