Daniels v. State

90 So. 3d 996, 2012 WL 2463956, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 10515
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 28, 2012·No. No. 1D12-1194·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. See Lawrence v. State, 987 So.2d 157, 158 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008) (holding that orders that deny some rule 3.850 claims but dismiss others with leave to amend are not final, appealable orders). The state’s contingent motion to dismiss, [997]*997filed in this Court on June 6, 2012, is denied as moot.

VAN NORTWICK, ROBERTS, and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Daniels v. State, 90 So. 3d 996, 2012 WL 2463956, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 10515 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

90 So. 3d 996 (Daniels v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lawrence v. State
987 So. 2d 157 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)