Daniels v. State

575 So. 2d 722, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 1735, 1991 WL 27162
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 20, 1991·No. No. 90-297·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was sentenced as a habitual felony offender. No court reporter was present during sentencing, however, the proceedings were recorded by audio tape recorder. The tape has been lost. Counsel and the trial court have been unable to prepare an adequate statement of the sentencing proceedings. See Fla.R.App.P. [723]*7239.200(b)(4). The appellee has filed an answer brief agreeing with appellant’s position that under such circumstances appellant’s sentence should be vacated and the case remanded for resentencing appellant. We agree.

Accordingly, appellant’s sentence is hereby vacated and this case is remanded for resentencing appellant. The resentencing proceedings shall be reported. See Fla.R. Jud.A. 2.070.

SHIVERS, C.J., and JOANOS and WOLF, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Daniels v. State, 575 So. 2d 722, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 1735, 1991 WL 27162 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

575 So. 2d 722 (Daniels v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ariko v. Nicholson
606 So. 2d 435 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)