Daniels v. State

414 So. 2d 1117, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20701
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 2, 1982·No. No. 80-737·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Reversed and remanded pursuant to the Supreme Court’s decisions in Tascano v. State, 393 So.2d 540 (Fla.1980) and Murray v. State, 403 So.2d 417 (Fla.1981). By these decisions the Supreme Court has apparently ruled that no matter how overwhelming the evidence may be, failure to give a requested instruction on the penalties for the crimes charged constitutes reversible error. We make no rulings on the other issues raised by appellant, none of which were properly presented in the trial court, and all of which may become moot or the subject of a subsequent plenary appeal.

DOWNEY and ANSTEAD, JJ., and OWEN, WILLIAM C, Jr., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Daniels v. State, 414 So. 2d 1117, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20701 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

414 So. 2d 1117 (Daniels v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kelly v. State
414 So. 2d 1117 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)