Daniels v. State
This text of Daniels v. State (Daniels v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
SHAWN D. DANIELS, § § No. 287, 2022 Defendant Below, § Appellant, § § Court Below–Superior Court v. § of the State of Delaware § STATE OF DELAWARE, § § Cr. ID No. 1509003025 (N) Appellee. §
Submitted: November 7, 2022 Decided: January 12, 2023
Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; VAUGHN and TRAYNOR, Justices.
ORDER
After careful consideration of the appellant’s opening brief, the State’s motion
to affirm, and the record on appeal, we find it evident that the judgment below should
be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons assigned in the Superior Court’s July
13, 2022 order clarifying its January 31, 2022 order and denying the appellant’s
motion for reargument.1 The appellant is not serving an illegal sentence.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the motion to affirm be
GRANTED and the judgment of the Superior Court be AFFIRMED.
BY THE COURT: /s/ Gary F. Traynor Justice
1 State v. Daniels, 2022 WL 2733509 (Del. Super. Ct. July 13, 2022).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Daniels v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniels-v-state-del-2023.