Daniels v. State

571 So. 2d 408, 1990 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1667, 1990 WL 212404
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Daniels v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 581 So. 2d 536
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama·Decided October 26, 1990·No. CR-89-648·Published

Opinion

ON RETURN TO REMAND

PATTERSON, Judge.

We remanded this case to the trial court with instructions to inform appellant of his rights under the Youthful Offender Act and to hold a proper investigation and hearing. 567 So.2d 880. The trial court has complied with our instructions and has filed a return to remand showing that the court advised appellant of his rights under the Youthful Offender Act and that, with appellant’s consent, the court investigated him, examined him, and denied his request for youthful offender treatment under the Act. The proceeding below appearing proper and in compliance with our instructions, the judgment is due to be, and it is hereby, affirmed.

OPINION EXTENDED; AFFIRMED.

All Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Daniels v. State, 571 So. 2d 408, 1990 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1667, 1990 WL 212404 (Ala. Ct. App. 1990).

571 So. 2d 408 (Daniels v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Daniels v. State
567 So. 2d 880 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1990)