Daniels v. St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad

Missouri Court of Appeals

Daniels v. St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad

109 S.W. 85, 130 Mo. App. 213, 1908 Mo. App. LEXIS 215

DecidedMarch 31, 1908

StatusPublished

This text of 109 S.W. 85 (Daniels v. St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Daniels v. St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad, 109 S.W. 85, 130 Mo. App. 213, 1908 Mo. App. LEXIS 215 (Mo. Ct. App. 1908).

Pincite

Opinion

GOODE, J.

In this case, instituted before a justice of the peace, for double damages for the killing of a steer, the record contains no evidence to prove the animal was killed in the township where the suit was brought or in an adjoining one. The township of the casualty was not proved, and for this reason the judgment must be reversed and the cause remanded. [Backenstoe v. Railroad, 86 Mo. 492.]

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GOODE, J.

In this case, instituted before a justice of the peace, for double damages for the killing of a steer, the record contains no evidence to prove the animal was killed in the township where the suit was brought or in an adjoining one. The township of the casualty was not proved, and for this reason the judgment must be reversed and the cause remanded. [Backenstoe v. Railroad, 86 Mo. 492.]

All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

109 S.W. 85, 130 Mo. App. 213, 1908 Mo. App. LEXIS 215, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniels-v-st-louis-san-francisco-railroad-moctapp-1908.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack