Daniels v. Smith

38 Mich. 660, 1878 Mich. LEXIS 149
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedApril 16, 1878
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 38 Mich. 660 (Daniels v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Daniels v. Smith, 38 Mich. 660, 1878 Mich. LEXIS 149 (Mich. 1878).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is a certiorari to review the pro-, ceedings of the drain commissioner of the township of Adams, in the county of Hillsdale, in laying out a drain ■and- assessing the cost on the persons supposed to be benefited. A number of objections are taken to the proceedings, but it is sufficient to notice as a fatal objection, that there is no evidence that the notice to the parties concerned, which the statute (Comp. L., § 1779; Laws 1875, p. 168) requires, was given. The proceedings must be quashed. People v. Highway Commissioners of Nankin, 14 Mich., 528; Sharpshooters’ Association v. Highway Commissioners of Hamtramck, 34 Mich., 36.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Parker v. Fort Worth & Denver City Railway Co.
19 S.W. 518 (Texas Supreme Court, 1892)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
38 Mich. 660, 1878 Mich. LEXIS 149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniels-v-smith-mich-1878.