Daniels v. Moore

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Daniels v. Moore

732 So. 2d 492, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 6789, 1999 WL 333301

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 26, 1999

DocketNo. 99-1275

StatusPublished

This text of 732 So. 2d 492 (Daniels v. Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Daniels v. Moore, 732 So. 2d 492, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 6789, 1999 WL 333301 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We deny Marcus Daniels’ petition for writ of habeas corpus wherein he alleges that his appellate counsel was ineffective. We note that Daniels’ allegations against trial counsel should have been presented to the trial court in a timely filed motion for post-conviction relief filed in accordance with Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.850 and 3.987.

FARMER, STEVENSON and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We deny Marcus Daniels’ petition for writ of habeas corpus wherein he alleges that his appellate counsel was ineffective. We note that Daniels’ allegations against trial counsel should have been presented to the trial court in a timely filed motion for post-conviction relief filed in accordance with Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.850 and 3.987.

FARMER, STEVENSON and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

732 So. 2d 492, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 6789, 1999 WL 333301, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniels-v-moore-fladistctapp-1999.