Daniels v. Kelly

California Supreme Court

Daniels v. Kelly

202 Cal. 792

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 17, 1928

DocketL. A. No. 10120

StatusPublished

This text of 202 Cal. 792 (Daniels v. Kelly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Daniels v. Kelly, 202 Cal. 792 (Cal. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

WASTE, C. J.

This is one of three motions to dismiss appeal. During the administration of the estate of Leonard Ovid Vaughan, deceased, the court below made an order confirming the sale of real property made by the executor. Edna Vaughan Daniels, a daughter of the deceased, and one of the persons entitled to a specific bequest of one thousand dollars under the provisions of the will of the decedent, appealed. Motion is now made to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the appellant is not a party aggrieved.

The moving parties and the appellant concede that, if it be held by this court, in disposing of the other motions to dismiss, that Edna Vaughan Daniels is not a party aggrieved by the judgment and decree denying the petition to revoke the probate of the will entered April 12, 1927, this appeal [793]*793should be dismissed. The court has so decided. (Estate of Vaughan, ante, p. 672 [262 Pac. 305].)

The appeal is dismissed.

Richards, J., Shenk, J., Seawell, J., Langdon, J., Preston, J., and Curtis, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WASTE, C. J.

This is one of three motions to dismiss appeal. During the administration of the estate of Leonard Ovid Vaughan, deceased, the court below made an order confirming the sale of real property made by the executor. Edna Vaughan Daniels, a daughter of the deceased, and one of the persons entitled to a specific bequest of one thousand dollars under the provisions of the will of the decedent, appealed. Motion is now made to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the appellant is not a party aggrieved.

The moving parties and the appellant concede that, if it be held by this court, in disposing of the other motions to dismiss, that Edna Vaughan Daniels is not a party aggrieved by the judgment and decree denying the petition to revoke the probate of the will entered April 12, 1927, this appeal [793]*793should be dismissed. The court has so decided. (Estate of Vaughan, ante, p. 672 [262 Pac. 305].)

The appeal is dismissed.

Richards, J., Shenk, J., Seawell, J., Langdon, J., Preston, J., and Curtis, J., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

202 Cal. 792, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniels-v-kelly-cal-1928.