Daniels v. Gunter
This text of 438 So. 2d 184 (Daniels v. Gunter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant Daniels has appealed the one-year suspension of his insurance licenses. We reverse only the portion of the agency’s final order which found that appellant used a “light box” in violation of various provisions of the insurance code;1 such a finding is not supported by substantial, competent evidence.
Watkins, a secretary employed at appellant’s insurance agency, testified before a hearing officer that on numerous Fridays a “light box” was used by Daniels and others to trace signatures on insurance applications. Watkins also related an incident involving an irate customer who presented himself at Daniels’ office to complain that he had not signed an application which bore his signature. No allegedly forged documents were introduced, no names of alleged forgery victims were presented, and no victims of the alleged forgeries testified at the hearing. The uncorroborated testimony of Watkins is insufficient to sustain the agency’s finding that appellant improperly used the “light box.” The remaining findings and conclusions in the final order are affirmed.
Appellant’s license was suspended for one year, the maximum penalty authorized by section 626.641, Florida Statutes (1981). We do not know whether the same penalty would have been imposed for the remaining violations absent the finding concerning the [185]*185“light box.” Therefore, we VACATE the penalty and REMAND for reconsideration thereof in light of this opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
438 So. 2d 184, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 21797, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniels-v-gunter-fladistctapp-1983.