Daniels v. Drucker
12 So. 3d 887, 2009 WL 1766621
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Daniels v. Drucker. Read the opinion of the Court — 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 8559 →
Opinion
Ronald DANIELS, and Rowena Daniels, individually and as parents and next friends of Ronald Daniels, Jr., a minor, Appellants,
v.
David DRUCKER, M.D. and South Florida Pediatric Surgeons, P.A., Appellees.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
*888 Ronald Daniels and Rowena Daniels, Pompano Beach, pro se.
Shelley H. Leinicke of Wicker, Smith, O'Hara, McCoy & Ford, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla. 1979).
GROSS, C.J., WARNER and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Daniels v. Drucker, 12 So. 3d 887, 2009 WL 1766621 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).
12 So. 3d 887 (Daniels v. Drucker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee
377 So. 2d 1150 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1979)
Daniels v. Drucker
12 So. 3d 887 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)