Daniels v. Daniels

4 So. 3d 484, 2008 Ala. LEXIS 198, 2008 WL 4277820
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedSeptember 19, 2008
Docket1070084
StatusPublished

This text of 4 So. 3d 484 (Daniels v. Daniels) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Daniels v. Daniels, 4 So. 3d 484, 2008 Ala. LEXIS 198, 2008 WL 4277820 (Ala. 2008).

Opinion

COBB, Chief Justice.

The petition for the writ of certiorari is quashed.

In quashing the petition for the writ of certiorari, this Court does not wish to be understood as approving all the language, reasons, or statements of law in the Court of Civil Appeals’ opinion. Horsley v. Horsley, 291 Ala. 782, 280 So.2d 155 (1973).

WRIT QUASHED.

SEE, LYONS, WOODALL, STUART, SMITH, BOLIN, PARKER, and MURDOCK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Horsley v. Horsley
280 So. 2d 155 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 So. 3d 484, 2008 Ala. LEXIS 198, 2008 WL 4277820, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniels-v-daniels-ala-2008.