Daniels v. Crane

Michigan Supreme Court

Daniels v. Crane

104 N.W. 736, 141 Mich. 499, 1905 Mich. LEXIS 819

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedSeptember 28, 1905

DocketDocket No. 95

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 104 N.W. 736 (Daniels v. Crane) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Daniels v. Crane, 104 N.W. 736, 141 Mich. 499, 1905 Mich. LEXIS 819 (Mich. 1905).

Pincite

Opinion

Moore, C. J.

This case was commenced by attachment. It was tried before the judge without a jury. No requests were filed for written findings of fact or law. None were found. The judge rendered a judgment in favor of the plaintiff. The case is brought here by writ of error. Under the repeated rulings of this court there is nothing for us to review. McDonell v. Union Trust Co., 139 Mich. 386; and the many cases there cited.

Judgment is affirmed.

Carpenter, McAlvay, Grant, and Blair, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moore, C. J.

This case was commenced by attachment. It was tried before the judge without a jury. No requests were filed for written findings of fact or law. None were found. The judge rendered a judgment in favor of the plaintiff. The case is brought here by writ of error. Under the repeated rulings of this court there is nothing for us to review. McDonell v. Union Trust Co., 139 Mich. 386; and the many cases there cited.

Judgment is affirmed.

Carpenter, McAlvay, Grant, and Blair, JJ., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

104 N.W. 736, 141 Mich. 499, 1905 Mich. LEXIS 819, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniels-v-crane-mich-1905.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack