Daniels v. City of New York

S.D. New York

Daniels v. City of New York

DecidedFebruary 5, 2020

Docket1:18-cv-03717

StatusUnknown

This text of Daniels v. City of New York (Daniels v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Daniels v. City of New York, (S.D.N.Y. 2020).

Pincite

Opinion

DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOC#: SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DATE FILED: 2 /$/Z0©

DESHAWN DANIELS, Plaintiff, -V- No. 18-CV-3717 (RA) DETECTIVE BRIAN TAYLOR, DETECTIVE JAMES CLEARY, SERGEANT WESLEY ORDER FRADERA, and DETECTIVE NEIL MAGLIANO, Defendants.

RONNIE ABRAMS, United States District Judge: No later than February 19, 2020, the parties shall submit supplemental briefing, not to exceed ten pages, discussing how the Supreme Court’s decision in McDonough v. Smith, 139 S.Ct. 2149 (2019), affects the analysis of Plaintiff's § 1983 fair trial claim. Specifically, the parties shall address the following questions: 1. Does McDonough establish that a favorable termination is an element of a fair trial claim? 2. Assuming McDonough establishes that a favorable termination is an element of a fair trial claim, does an adjournment in contemplation of dismissal constitute a favorable termination in the context of a fair trial claim even if it does not constitute a favorable termination in the context of a malicious prosecution claim? In answering this question, the parties shall discuss the Eastern District of New York’s decision in Ross v. City of New York, No. 17-CV-3505 (PKC), 2019 WL 4805147, at *6-8 (E.D.N.Y. Sept. 30, 2019). SO ORDERED. Dated: February 5, 2020 New York, New York Ronnie Abrams United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DESHAWN DANIELS, Plaintiff, -V- No. 18-CV-3717 (RA) DETECTIVE BRIAN TAYLOR, DETECTIVE JAMES CLEARY, SERGEANT WESLEY ORDER FRADERA, and DETECTIVE NEIL MAGLIANO, Defendants.

RONNIE ABRAMS, United States District Judge: No later than February 19, 2020, the parties shall submit supplemental briefing, not to exceed ten pages, discussing how the Supreme Court’s decision in McDonough v. Smith, 139 S.Ct. 2149 (2019), affects the analysis of Plaintiff's § 1983 fair trial claim. Specifically, the parties shall address the following questions: 1. Does McDonough establish that a favorable termination is an element of a fair trial claim? 2. Assuming McDonough establishes that a favorable termination is an element of a fair trial claim, does an adjournment in contemplation of dismissal constitute a favorable termination in the context of a fair trial claim even if it does not constitute a favorable termination in the context of a malicious prosecution claim? In answering this question, the parties shall discuss the Eastern District of New York’s decision in Ross v. City of New York, No. 17-CV-3505 (PKC), 2019 WL 4805147, at *6-8 (E.D.N.Y. Sept. 30, 2019). SO ORDERED. Dated: February 5, 2020 New York, New York Ronnie Abrams United States District Judge

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Daniels v. City of New York, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniels-v-city-of-new-york-nysd-2020.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack