Daniels v. City of New York
855 N.E.2d 1168, 7 N.Y.3d 825, 822 N.Y.S.2d 753, 2006 N.Y. LEXIS 2582
This text of 855 N.E.2d 1168 (Daniels v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Daniels v. City of New York, 855 N.E.2d 1168, 7 N.Y.3d 825, 822 N.Y.S.2d 753, 2006 N.Y. LEXIS 2582 (N.Y. 2006).
Opinion
Motion, insofar as made by Robin Daniels for leave to appeal, dismissed upon the ground that Robin Daniels, having not appealed to the Appellate Division, is not a party aggrieved (see Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals § 11:9, at 393 [rev 3d ed 2005]); motion, insofar as made by Eric Daniels for leave to appeal, denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
855 N.E.2d 1168, 7 N.Y.3d 825, 822 N.Y.S.2d 753, 2006 N.Y. LEXIS 2582, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniels-v-city-of-new-york-ny-2006.