Daniels v. Carlson
69 So. 3d 400, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 14651, 2011 WL 4104997
Opinion
Upon consideration of the appellant’s response to the Court’s order of August 8, 2011, the Court has determined that claims disposed of by the lower tribunal in the order on appeal are inextricably intertwined with those claims left pending. Therefore, the July 20, 2011, Final Judgment of Foreclosure and Reformation of Instrument does not constitute a partial final judgment subject to immediate review pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.110(k). Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed as premature.
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Daniels v. Carlson, 69 So. 3d 400, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 14651, 2011 WL 4104997 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).
69 So. 3d 400 (Daniels v. Carlson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Caye v. Caye
69 So. 3d 400 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)