Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Daniels v. Carlson

Daniels v. Carlson

69 So. 3d 400, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 14651, 2011 WL 4104997
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 16, 2011
Docket1D11-3836
StatusPublished

This text of 69 So. 3d 400 (Daniels v. Carlson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Daniels v. Carlson, 69 So. 3d 400, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 14651, 2011 WL 4104997 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the appellant’s response to the Court’s order of August 8, 2011, the Court has determined that claims disposed of by the lower tribunal in the order on appeal are inextricably intertwined with those claims left pending. Therefore, the July 20, 2011, Final Judgment of Foreclosure and Reformation of Instrument does not constitute a partial final judgment subject to immediate review pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.110(k). Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed as premature.

DISMISSED.

BENTON, C.J., HAWKES, and ROWE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Caye v. Caye
69 So. 3d 400 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
69 So. 3d 400, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 14651, 2011 WL 4104997, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniels-v-carlson-fladistctapp-2011.