Daniels v. Caldwell

Fourth Circuit

Daniels v. Caldwell

645 F. App'x 293

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedApril 21, 2016

DocketNo. 15-7884

StatusPublished

This text of 645 F. App'x 293 (Daniels v. Caldwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Daniels v. Caldwell, 645 F. App'x 293 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Joseph A. Daniels appeals the district court’s order denying his “Motion for Judgment” that the district court construed as motion for relief under Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for-the reasons stated by the district court. Daniels v. Caldwell, No. 3:14-cv-00856-REP-RCY, 2015 WL 7283121 (E.D.Va. Nov. 16, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this [294]*294court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Joseph A. Daniels appeals the district court’s order denying his “Motion for Judgment” that the district court construed as motion for relief under Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for-the reasons stated by the district court. Daniels v. Caldwell, No. 3:14-cv-00856-REP-RCY, 2015 WL 7283121 (E.D.Va. Nov. 16, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this [294]*294court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

645 F. App'x 293, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniels-v-caldwell-ca4-2016.