Daniels v. Almodovar
This text of 240 A.D.2d 696 (Daniels v. Almodovar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for wrongful death, the defendant Strathmore Concrete Corp. appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Underwood, J.), dated July 9, 1996, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against it.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs.
We agree with the Supreme Court that there exist triable issues of fact precluding the grant of summary judgment to the appellant (see, Celardo v Bell, 222 AD2d 547; Famularo v Havasi, 221 AD2d 587; Freeman Lbr. Co. v Dutton Lbr. Corp., 220 AD2d 641; Rudnitsky v Robbins, 191 AD2d 488; see also, Ugarriza v Schmeider, 46 NY2d 471; deVoil v Wallace, 221 AD2d 411; Goldberg v Nelson, 202 AD2d 390; Chahales v Garber, 195 AD2d 585; cf., Stoehr v Levere, 183 AD2d 886). Thompson, J. P., Joy, Altman and Florio, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
240 A.D.2d 696, 660 N.Y.S.2d 1000, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7164, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniels-v-almodovar-nyappdiv-1997.