Daniels, Raymond
Opinion
\`:_‘L. @c@`W_ T¢;&\~ c_\- .m.&@\l'@&>: ‘1’983 w 1 L(Xl§gq
§ U \SSQ CL\£§ § age Cf`\ w`\m.\ \MQP€C.\.S A\)\v~\tm Q\C ‘ ` '
FDRECEWED m
\3 1 _ 1`¢£‘,|'~{, ‘A‘l. ’/1_"?~».
§ ua.uo€j_§ oz Qac,xis Qc>\l 5\'\¢\~¢ g Q.B\\>S\A.‘€°` ana S\Mb(dcz\‘\ &\»oq C.(AHA‘W§§§ @F®FB<
MC>\Q Q(>w\€$ Q,~LWX& Quakm»&bmo§e\s`§@ \QiU\e
(`l\bb\)f’_ C,C\M§`£, amax L_)Ou..
S\\c>u, ib\ve.. \lonomb\e Couj"’ A-»\l\f §'O \/\0\.0\\0€3:>
.'L\. K\QQ\`\~'¢:,Q~.)\ bw c§ms jume \{\9_ \5 C\\\ \0\¢€§ C_,\G;\\e»~": C>: \\\5€,§'¥€_£.¥00€, CLSS\SX£¢\Q££ D$ (:C\M\)S'€,\ b&">t(§\ ©\5 SE.C\'(`C\’\ \BSLL€.$ ‘ §€.C_¢ \<\\\N\W\e\w\a\% \!& \\'\m§`\ge.\§
L"\"`lv`\ \l 3 365 (\Q%L\
O\\ L. 13 §§ 305 \C>(D% civ D\S'V-\
ad b °_daw\ff'z \! \YDCL\ wu_€> \\3€{“§:¢\\\)€ &o\(l \Qv\/ \`(\0\40\1\603 E.\\L D`C\DM` `§\A&»c,§c¢\ %§5\-\3§£,\ C,D\u§`§( QD‘Q`OL ©§"C‘Tha\ \'\ 5de R\r€§\)\c R,\NE_ W\D`\oto ‘\,»D Su\{)Qw€;S 03 \__L Y/\\ \§rem;ee§\{\usr%\.;.&§ c \\~ec§ \\\\,\B\)~S\c 6 QLC>\»Q 33 \Y\§Mw m gm ©r@§m\ mz>¢¢,§@ S\:R_e.sg §§W\Qw\'\( due \.b \\\/\e §(`\\\e&\ GMS€uvA/\ …Q \\Cc\¢§\s Cf:\\\ (3\~3\\)€ QO\ 049/3 , §$e_e:mg L . \hs \{d (;m§i \B§\* \Le§ “\/ @SF mow 0;@…@& C_Ow"\: W\f,\:smskcuwe \`\s\e§ hs C§,\&\;»\o`~\§ Q\ M>€>\§aa@~\ §§ C.D W\Q\a`n\)`“o 1 C\Ao¢\n o.§"\\-QQ $\Mo'\>\U/\S \U/»e M\,o@we,v\ ames \1 »`\'occ`.¢ \Aa§ g~e“b‘lb as\L. \\X,\e_ C_buu ~\_ P¢'\ML... `\\nve_§\~l`\cjw\®a vch cowech _Tv`c\§§‘u; tj‘§@&‘mm mr"~<\§¥e@ 00 C\L m§g,\»\¢< §§ Nb\d ._ q""“ ;\0\\ kewew \\/\:\E/ \\O\).~SL.S 09 640on a.v\)& \Bv§vv\ lmj 7 ©§\:\;LCPQ @P\`\Q€_‘QAWOE>°\ C\/\§§ §\\>‘¥o€w\c¢‘l§a¢o \DO\)\\§` \/\C\\)€ ">vo\m\d \/\/\0\`\' DQCZCC\ZS_\,Q~Q\I€, ` lpv\w§\\\)g ("'JL C:dcud¢c.m\>R-O O.\QD\¥\\@\LVE\M¢[€/ C:u\) §::>C&`Ym\)e\`v m3 'NDR\l\n 03 %ia:a '\Nc§> 93 R§>Q\§§cm\ \\< was ®\)\eéc even N\© ¢\\LLN ` @¢€Ss §§ t 0\~3 R\x§ @`L\’\QD\Q"\ `¥\l\v%& a\l¢<\,or\\:>e Ww: “\5\\»€/ CO\M§¢\?Q&\{:‘\Y`\[§OQ §§ v\/\O\\J\\K`s 1 ' \(\U>w\ § € 05 0\ ,Pg \KMOM)P‘ ,00&1_°1' Qw&‘db §OQ` "\'v Ra\ \/ O\\\)& RLXM:>€>\ §§ iiiL m & QWM\ \M'mg A;/§S;Xm \1}\~£ W\D\\lz> 0 \L, £U\W€SS \.\> ' ®9\`\€,&10¥ § \».&L `Q\!ED>LQE>"> §§ 0 §\A£c§§\\m:.\:>\a l C»O\ `Y<§\K\ ‘u.wl\;\el §`“\ \ \L\ "‘\ 5 | QV)D`OpB “\N\e\\§.,\b\<> § '\lsS'CD\OS`\" l j 4 1 4 \`\cu¢§§ 4. wis 4)\,\2~.4¢ w\\/?_\o \\1£ C,D»L{ 404 4\§;§0\\4§€§ é:uwe>+;\ ‘},i&wes \)1 \\30<;0,1 \16/4 §W\D\\A\A"> QC\S.S Q¥`x`€@ §\\4¢0€_.»>\ 4./\1\& \MO`\/\DD 455 SV\Q?`{C€>‘) \ 01\\3§§ \\9&\1€(2 ¢\\2140 ur€¥¢ic¢\ €w\\)fg N\©\,§OO 4b \4\£\101:\/4\/1€,\!\/|5¥1010 433\\&$?\9€&5 m 01 owed c\`l\@wdb 46\>\1 04<§1§1¥1@10(,40\0‘€ \Me \11/\ Q`ave=b CL\Q§C§\\¢S‘:\, 419:&4;40 CD 444 \De ng‘¢ mo §&§`\M\O\a§:€ @1.~1\3\0\1@\1\ § § R\Q\Q\VCQ£§‘ 435 4>\‘€05 0\<> °'bcuo 15, 30\3'~ . 10 4.00 g Gva»o¥4 11@\11111.\\1111 111 443 § 4\\`\19, 14[ 60\0 \1¢0€\1\/\~(\_)~\/ 3 111111$> - q ~..M.(;..M ¢T_;-;~#~ ~ » \\\\@\r . l wt':‘::; g ~ x i,i’ l ~l~ n `~". _ CAUSE NO 2012- Cl\- 2293 §§§~'",=1, §§ (`»~ 111 . snile oil TEXAS s IN iiiizag);rsmtkr@i Wobiéi ~ \ ~; l`\,§ ;“;;J '\’. ,’»~: 'm . n ':~~`4" . ZC)() ]UI)I‘C_I,A£T?Q,I§{ RI(, .l UJWJ VS. UW RAYMOND DANIELS CJJ` MOTION 'l`O` SUPPRESS ' TO 1111: IIONOIU~\BLE }UDGl: OF S'AID COUI\[`: `l\low comes Raymond Daniels, Defendant, and files this Motion to Suppress_and shows the following: n b 1. Defendant has been charged with the offense of F‘elon Possession of Firearm. 2.` T he actions of the San Antonio Police Department viola ted the constitutional and statutory rights of the Defendant under the Fourth, vPifth,v Sixth and liourteenth Am'endments to the Uni`te_d States Cons`titution, Article I, Section 9 of the Texas Const§itutionz and under Article 38.23l of the Texas .Code.of C.riminal Procedure. ,3. 4 Raymond Daniels was arrested without lawful warrant, probable eause or other lawful authority in violation of the rights of Raymond `Daniels pursuant to the Fourth, `Fiffth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the 'Uni ted St`ates Constitution, Article I, Sections 9, 10 and 19 of the Constitution of the State'of Texas. 4. An_y statements obtained from Rayrnond Danielswere'obtained in violation of`A.rtic-le 38'.»22 of the Texas Code~of'Criminal Procedure and in violation of the rights of Raymon_d Dan.iels pursuant to the Fourth, Fifth, Si> 5. Any tangible evidence seized in connection with this case was seized without warrant, probable cause or other lawful authority in violation of the rights of Raylnond Daniels pursuant to the F'ourth, Pifth, Sixth, and Fourtee_nth Amendrnents to the United B_EXA.R CouNTY, nms . 4 ».1...%,, States Constitution, Article I, Sections 9, 10 and 19 of the Constitution of the State of Texas. 6. Therefore, the Defendant requests that the following matters be suppressed at trial of this cause: _ n v a. \Any and all tangible evidence seized by law enforcement officers or others in connection with the detention and arrest of Raymond Daniels in this case or in connection with the investigation of this case, and any testimony by the San Antonio Police Department or any other law enforcement officers or others concerning such evidencel b. The arrest of Raymond Daniels_at the time and place in question and any and all evidence which relates to the arrest, and any testimony by the San Antonio l’olice Department or any other vlaw enforcement officers or others concerning any action of Raymond Daniels while in detention or under arrest in connection with this case. c. All written and oral statements made by Raymond Daniels to any law enforcement officers or others in connection with this case, and any testimony by the San Antonio Po]ice Department or any other law enforcement officers or others concerning any - such statements d. Any other matters that the Court finds should be suppressed upon hearing of this motion. _ _ WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Defendant prays that the Court suppress such matters at trial of this cause, and for such other and further relief in connection therewith that is proper. j Respectfully submitted, Law Office of ]ames V. Tocci y 222 South Flores Street San Antonio, TX 78204 y: l V. JAMES‘T_och ,_ State ar No.24008165 Attor ey"for Raymond Daniels CERTIFICAT!*} OF §§ \VICE I hereby certify that a copy of the above and foregoing Motion to Suppress was hand delivered to the County -Atto_rney's Office, at the Bexar Cou ty ]ustice Center, 300 Dolorosa, San-Antonio, Texas 78205, on JAMES l l '-l .»--“*® c`.AUsli No. zoiz-CR-zz<)s STATE OF TEXAS §' IN TI~IE l)IS'l`RIC'l` COURT l ' § vs. § 29()""' ]UI)IClAL I)ISTRICT § _ RAYMO_ND DANIELS § BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS 1 ORDER On 2012, came on to.be considered'the defendant's Motion to Suppress in the above-styled and numbered cause, the Court having considered the, 1 evidence which the State will offer at trial, rules that said Motion to Suppress is: (GRANTED) (DENIED) § Signed on , 2012. ]UDGE PRESIDING
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Daniels, Raymond (Daniels, Raymond) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.