Daniello v. MacHise Express Co.

New Jersey Superior Court App Division

Daniello v. MacHise Express Co.

299 A.2d 423, 122 N.J. Super. 144, 1973 N.J. Super. LEXIS 654

CourtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

DecidedJanuary 26, 1973

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 299 A.2d 423 (Daniello v. MacHise Express Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Daniello v. MacHise Express Co., 299 A.2d 423, 122 N.J. Super. 144, 1973 N.J. Super. LEXIS 654 (N.J. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

122 N.J. Super. 144 (1973) 299 A.2d 423

FELIX DANIELLO, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,
v.
MACHISE EXPRESS CO., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Submitted January 15, 1973. Decided January 26, 1973.

*145 Before Judges COLLESTER, LEONARD and HALPERN.

Messrs. Freeman & Spence, attorneys for appellant; Mr. William P. Freeman, on the brief).

Messrs. Curcio, Donio & DeMarco, attorneys for respondent (Mr. Mark A. DeMarco, on the brief).

PER CURIAM.

In this workmen's compensation case, the employer appeals from a judgment entered by the County Court which adjudicated that the injuries sustained by petitioner in the accident of September 16, 1969 were compensable and which reversed the dismissal of his claim petition by the Division.

We affirm essentially for the reasons stated by Judge Horn in his written opinion as reported in 119 N.J. Super. 20 (Law Div. 1972).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

122 N.J. Super. 144 (1973) 299 A.2d 423

FELIX DANIELLO, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,
v.
MACHISE EXPRESS CO., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Submitted January 15, 1973. Decided January 26, 1973.

*145 Before Judges COLLESTER, LEONARD and HALPERN.

Messrs. Freeman & Spence, attorneys for appellant; Mr. William P. Freeman, on the brief).

Messrs. Curcio, Donio & DeMarco, attorneys for respondent (Mr. Mark A. DeMarco, on the brief).

PER CURIAM.

In this workmen's compensation case, the employer appeals from a judgment entered by the County Court which adjudicated that the injuries sustained by petitioner in the accident of September 16, 1969 were compensable and which reversed the dismissal of his claim petition by the Division.

We affirm essentially for the reasons stated by Judge Horn in his written opinion as reported in 119 N.J. Super. 20 (Law Div. 1972).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

299 A.2d 423, 122 N.J. Super. 144, 1973 N.J. Super. LEXIS 654, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniello-v-machise-express-co-njsuperctappdiv-1973.

Opinion

FELIX DANIELLO, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. MACHISE EXPRESS CO., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

FELIX DANIELLO, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,
v.
MACHISE EXPRESS CO., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.