Danielle Renee Cano v. Dennis Mark Anderson
This text of Danielle Renee Cano v. Dennis Mark Anderson (Danielle Renee Cano v. Dennis Mark Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued February 26, 2019
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-18-00791-CV ——————————— DANIELLE RENEE CANO, Appellant V. DENNIS MARK ANDERSON, Appellee
On Appeal from the 295th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2018-16260
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Danielle Renee Cano, has neither paid the required fees nor
established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 145; TEX.
R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.851(b), 51.941(a),
101.141; Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation, Misc. Docket
No. 15-9158 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2015). Further, appellant has not paid or made
arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the clerk’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P.
37.3(b). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellants did
not adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c).
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees and
for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 37.3(b), 42.3(b), (c), 43.2(f). We
dismiss any pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Goodman and Countiss.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Danielle Renee Cano v. Dennis Mark Anderson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/danielle-renee-cano-v-dennis-mark-anderson-texapp-2019.