Danielle Marshall v. Matthew Marshall

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 12, 2022
Docket05-21-01008-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Danielle Marshall v. Matthew Marshall (Danielle Marshall v. Matthew Marshall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Danielle Marshall v. Matthew Marshall, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

DISMISS and Opinion Filed January 12, 2022

S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-21-01008-CV

DANIELLE MARSHALL, Appellant V. MATTHEW MARSHALL, Appellee

On Appeal from the 301st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-20-15529

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Burns, Justice Molberg, and Justice Goldstein Opinion by Chief Justice Burns The filing fee, docketing statement, and clerk’s record in this case have not

been filed. By postcard dated November 19, 2021, we notified appellant the $205

filing fee was due. We directed appellant to remit the filing fee within ten days and

expressly cautioned appellant that failure to do so would result in dismissal of the

appeal. Also by postcard dated November 19, 2021, we informed appellant the

docketing statement in this case was due. We cautioned appellant that failure to file

the docketing statement within ten days might result in the dismissal of this appeal

without further notice. By letter dated December 14, 2021, we informed appellant

the clerk’s record had not been filed because appellant had not paid for the clerk’s record. We directed appellant to provide, within ten days, verification that she (1)

had either paid for or made arrangements to pay for the record, or (2) is entitled to

proceed without payment of costs. We cautioned appellant that failure to do so

would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. To date, appellant

has not paid the filing fee, filed the docketing statement, provided the required

documentation, or otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this

appeal.

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b); 42.3(b), (c).

/Robert D. Burns, III/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

211008F.P05

–2– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

DANIELLE MARSHALL, Appellant On Appeal from the 301st Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas No. 05-21-01008-CV V. Trial Court Cause No. DF-20-15529. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice MATTHEW MARSHALL, Appellee Burns. Justices Molberg and Goldstein participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.

Judgment entered January 12, 2022

–3–

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Danielle Marshall v. Matthew Marshall, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/danielle-marshall-v-matthew-marshall-texapp-2022.