Danielle L. Hancock v. State of Florida
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Nos. 1D17-4151
1D17-4153
(consolidated for disposition)
DANIELLE L. HANCOCK,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Wakulla County. James O. Shelfer, Judge.
August 29, 2019
PER CURIAM.
We find the trial court did not err in making its competency determination; it did, however, neglect to put its oral ruling in writing. We, therefore, affirm but remand for entry of a written order. McCray v. State, 265 So. 3d 659 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019).
AFFIRMED and REMANDED with instructions.
WOLF, B.L. THOMAS, and BILBREY, JJ., concur.
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.
Office of Candice K. Brower, Criminal Conflict & Civil Regional Counsel, and Melissa J. Ford, Assistant Regional Conflict Counsel, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Anne C. Conley and Damaris E, Reynolds, Assistant Attorneys General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Danielle L. Hancock v. State of Florida (Danielle L. Hancock v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.