Daniella Renee Chavez v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 13, 2019
Docket02-19-00379-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Daniella Renee Chavez v. State (Daniella Renee Chavez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Daniella Renee Chavez v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

FILE COPY

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth NOS. 02-19-378-CR 02-19-379-CR

DANIELLA RENEE CHAVEZ APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------

FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY

-----------

ABATEMENT ORDER

We have considered the “Appellant's Motion To Withdraw” filed by John

Brender, appellant’s retained counsel.

We abate the appeal and remand this case to the trial court. The trial court

shall immediately conduct a hearing with appellant present to:

1. Determine whether appellant desires to prosecute her appeal;

2. Determine whether appellant desires to proceed pro se; FILE COPY

3. If appellant desires to proceed pro se, admonish appellant of the dangers and disadvantages of self-representation in accordance with Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 835, 95 S. Ct. 2525, 2541 (1975), and Hubbard v. State, 739 S.W.2d 341, 345 (Tex. Crim. App. 1987);

4. Determine whether appellant is indigent. If appellant is determined to be indigent, ascertain whether new counsel should be appointed to represent appellant and appoint counsel, if necessary;1

5. If appellant desires to proceed pro se, determine whether that decision is competently and intelligently made; and

6. Take any other measures that the trial court deems necessary to insure appellant does not forfeit her right to appeal.

The trial court shall file a record of the hearing in this court on or before

Friday, December 13, 2019. The record shall include a supplemental reporter’s

record and supplemental clerk’s record. Upon our receipt of the supplemental record,

the appeal of this cause shall be automatically reinstated without further order. The

appellant’s motion will be ruled on at that time.

The clerk of this court shall transmit a copy of this order to appellant, the

attorneys of record, the trial judge, the trial court clerk, and the court reporter.

DATED November 13, 2019.

Per Curiam

1If new counsel is appointed to represent appellant, the supplemental record shall reflect that counsel has been notified of the appointment. If appellant is incarcerated, the trial court shall also retain her in the county for a reasonable period of time to allow new counsel an opportunity to confer with appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Faretta v. California
422 U.S. 806 (Supreme Court, 1975)
Hubbard v. State
739 S.W.2d 341 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Daniella Renee Chavez v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniella-renee-chavez-v-state-texapp-2019.