Danielak v. City of New York

Second Circuit

Danielak v. City of New York

209 F. App'x 55

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedDecember 15, 2006

DocketNo. 05-5861

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 209 F. App'x 55 (Danielak v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Danielak v. City of New York, 209 F. App'x 55 (2d Cir. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

[56]*56SUMMARY ORDER

Plaintiff-appellant Tadensz Danielak, pro se, appeals from the judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Matsumoto, M.J.) entered pursuant to a Memorandum Decision and Order dated September 26, 2005. The parties’ familiarity with the facts is assumed. For substantially the reasons stated in the District Court’s Order, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[56]*56SUMMARY ORDER

Plaintiff-appellant Tadensz Danielak, pro se, appeals from the judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Matsumoto, M.J.) entered pursuant to a Memorandum Decision and Order dated September 26, 2005. The parties’ familiarity with the facts is assumed. For substantially the reasons stated in the District Court’s Order, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

209 F. App'x 55, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/danielak-v-city-of-new-york-ca2-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack