Daniel Woolard Knox v. State
This text of Daniel Woolard Knox v. State (Daniel Woolard Knox v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-11-00095-CR
Daniel Woolard Knox, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, 277TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 09-1687-K277, HONORABLE KEN ANDERSON, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss his appeal, explaining that issues related to
the terms of his sentence have been clarified. The motion is signed by appellant and his attorney in
compliance with rule 42.2. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal.
____________________________________
David Puryear, Justice
Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton and Rose
Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion
Filed: March 30, 2011
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Daniel Woolard Knox v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniel-woolard-knox-v-state-texapp-2011.