Daniel William Rudd v. Andrea Joy Averill
This text of Daniel William Rudd v. Andrea Joy Averill (Daniel William Rudd v. Andrea Joy Averill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
June 30, 2020 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice
160905 David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem
Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra DANIEL WILLIAM RUDD, Richard H. Bernstein Plaintiff-Appellant, Elizabeth T. Clement Megan K. Cavanagh, Justices v SC: 160905 COA: 349319 Muskegon CC: 07-036874-DM ANDREA JOY AVERILL, f/k/a ANDREA JOY WAGENMAKER, f/k/a ANDREA JOY RUDD, Defendant-Appellee. _____________________________________/
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 6, 2019 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. June 30, 2020 b0622 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Daniel William Rudd v. Andrea Joy Averill, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniel-william-rudd-v-andrea-joy-averill-mich-2020.