Daniel Wayne Curtis v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Daniel Wayne Curtis v. State

DecidedJune 2, 2016

Docket01-15-01017-CR

StatusPublished

This text of Daniel Wayne Curtis v. State (Daniel Wayne Curtis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Daniel Wayne Curtis v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Daniel Wayne Curtis v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-15-01017-CR

Trial court case number: 1960764

Trial court: County Criminal Court at Law No. 11 of Harris County

Appellant, Daniel Wayne Curtis, has filed his notice of appeal of the trial court’s judgment of conviction for the misdemeanor offense of driving while intoxicated. The clerk’s record was filed in this Court on December 17, 2015. The reporter’s record was due to be filed no later than November 30, 2015, but has not been filed.

On December 9, 2015, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that the Court might consider the appeal without a reporter’s record unless he provided proof that he had made arrangements to pay for the reporter’s record or was entitled to proceed without payment of costs. Appellant responded, showing payment for the reporter’s record on January 8, 2016. On March 21, 2016, court reporter Elizabeth Cordova requested an extension of time to file the reporter’s record to March 31, 2016. Cordova’s request indicated that the reporter’s record will cover two days of testimony and be approximately 200 pages. We granted the requested extension to March 31, 2016. On April 15, 2016, Cordova requested a second extension of time. We granted the requested extension to April 26, 2016, with no further extensions absent extraordinary circumstances. No reporter’s record has been filed.

The reporter’s record is due to be filed in this Court no later than 30 days from the date of this order. No extensions will be granted. If Elizabeth Cordova, or substitute court reporter, does not file the reporter’s record as directed, the Court may abate this appeal and remand the case to the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine the reason for the failure to file the reporter’s record. It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Russell Lloyd  Acting individually

Date: June 2, 2016

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Daniel Wayne Curtis v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-15-01017-CR

Trial court case number: 1960764

Trial court: County Criminal Court at Law No. 11 of Harris County

Appellant, Daniel Wayne Curtis, has filed his notice of appeal of the trial court’s judgment of conviction for the misdemeanor offense of driving while intoxicated. The clerk’s record was filed in this Court on December 17, 2015. The reporter’s record was due to be filed no later than November 30, 2015, but has not been filed.

On December 9, 2015, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that the Court might consider the appeal without a reporter’s record unless he provided proof that he had made arrangements to pay for the reporter’s record or was entitled to proceed without payment of costs. Appellant responded, showing payment for the reporter’s record on January 8, 2016. On March 21, 2016, court reporter Elizabeth Cordova requested an extension of time to file the reporter’s record to March 31, 2016. Cordova’s request indicated that the reporter’s record will cover two days of testimony and be approximately 200 pages. We granted the requested extension to March 31, 2016. On April 15, 2016, Cordova requested a second extension of time. We granted the requested extension to April 26, 2016, with no further extensions absent extraordinary circumstances. No reporter’s record has been filed.

The reporter’s record is due to be filed in this Court no later than 30 days from the date of this order. No extensions will be granted. If Elizabeth Cordova, or substitute court reporter, does not file the reporter’s record as directed, the Court may abate this appeal and remand the case to the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine the reason for the failure to file the reporter’s record. It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Russell Lloyd  Acting individually

Date: June 2, 2016

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Daniel Wayne Curtis v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniel-wayne-curtis-v-state-texapp-2016.