Daniel Ward Hunter v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided August 29, 2018·No. 09-18-00224-CR·Published

Opinion

In The

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-18-00224-CR ____________________

DANIEL WARD HUNTER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee _______________________________________________________ ______________

On Appeal from the 359th District Court Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 16-03-03783-CR ________________________________________________________ _____________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On July 2, 2018, we notified the parties that the appeal would be dismissed

for want of prosecution unless arrangements were made for filing the record or the

appellant explained why he needed more time for filing the record. See Tex. R. App.

P. 37.3(b). The appellant, Daniel Ward Hunter, did not file a response. It appears

that the appellant is not entitled to proceed without payment of costs. See Tex. R.

App. P. 20.2. There being no satisfactory explanation for the failure to file the record,

the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).

1 APPEAL DISMISSED.

________________________________ LEANNE JOHNSON Justice

Submitted on August 28, 2018 Opinion Delivered August 29, 2018 Do Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Daniel Ward Hunter v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Daniel Ward Hunter v. State (Daniel Ward Hunter v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.