Daniel Ward Hunter v. State
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-18-00224-CR ____________________
DANIEL WARD HUNTER, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee _______________________________________________________ ______________
On Appeal from the 359th District Court Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 16-03-03783-CR ________________________________________________________ _____________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On July 2, 2018, we notified the parties that the appeal would be dismissed
for want of prosecution unless arrangements were made for filing the record or the
appellant explained why he needed more time for filing the record. See Tex. R. App.
P. 37.3(b). The appellant, Daniel Ward Hunter, did not file a response. It appears
that the appellant is not entitled to proceed without payment of costs. See Tex. R.
App. P. 20.2. There being no satisfactory explanation for the failure to file the record,
the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).
1 APPEAL DISMISSED.
________________________________ LEANNE JOHNSON Justice
Submitted on August 28, 2018 Opinion Delivered August 29, 2018 Do Not Publish
Before McKeithen, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Daniel Ward Hunter v. State (Daniel Ward Hunter v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.