Daniel W Rudd v. City of Norton Shores
This text of Daniel W Rudd v. City of Norton Shores (Daniel W Rudd v. City of Norton Shores) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
January 15, 2021 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice
Brian K. Zahra 162370(21) David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Elizabeth T. Clement Megan K. Cavanagh Elizabeth M. Welch, DANIEL W RUDD, Justices Plaintiff-Appellant, SC: 162370 v COA: 354840 Muskegon CC: 17-004334-CZ CITY OF NORTON SHORES, Defendant-Appellee. ______________________________________/
On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendant-appellee to extend the time for filing its answer to the application for leave to appeal is GRANTED. The answer will be accepted as timely filed if submitted on or before February 2, 2021.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. January 15, 2021
Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Daniel W Rudd v. City of Norton Shores, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniel-w-rudd-v-city-of-norton-shores-mich-2021.