Daniel W Rudd v. City of Norton Shores
This text of Daniel W Rudd v. City of Norton Shores (Daniel W Rudd v. City of Norton Shores) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
June 6, 2018 Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice
Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack 157879 & (20) David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Kurtis T. Wilder Elizabeth T. Clement, DANIEL W. RUDD, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee, v SC: 157879 COA: 343759 Muskegon CC: 17-004334-CZ CITY OF NORTON SHORES, Defendant-Appellant.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the May 31, 2018 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. June 6, 2018 s0606 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Daniel W Rudd v. City of Norton Shores, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniel-w-rudd-v-city-of-norton-shores-mich-2018.