Daniel Victor Saldana v. State
This text of Daniel Victor Saldana v. State (Daniel Victor Saldana v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion Granted; Order filed April 9, 2020
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________
NO. 14-19-00826-CR ____________
DANIEL VICTOR SALDANA, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 228th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1541510
ORDER
Appellant’s court-appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Appellant filed a motion requesting to review the record and file a pro se brief. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). The motion is granted. Accordingly, we hereby direct the Judge of the 228th District Court to afford appellant an opportunity to view the trial record in accordance with local procedure; that the clerk of that court furnish the record to appellant on or before April 24, 2020; that the clerk of that court certify to this court the date on which delivery of the record to appellant is made; and that appellant file his pro se brief with this court within thirty days of that date.
PER CURIAM
Panel Consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Jewell and Spain.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Daniel Victor Saldana v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniel-victor-saldana-v-state-texapp-2020.