Daniel Vadnais v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 15, 2015
Docket03-14-00578-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Daniel Vadnais v. State (Daniel Vadnais v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Daniel Vadnais v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

ACCEPTED 03-14-00578-CR 3788792 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 1/15/2015 4:34:53 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE CLERK IN THE THIRD COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS FILED IN DANIEL VADNAIS 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS V. NO. 03-14-00578-CR 1/15/2015 4:34:53 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE THE STATE OF TEXAS Clerk

APPELLANT’S FIRST MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE BRIEF

TO THE HONORABLE THIRD COURT OF APPEALS:

COMES NOW, Daniel Vadnais, by and through his attorney of record, Dal

Ruggles, and files this, his First Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief, and in

support thereof would show the Court the following:

I.

That the above styled and numbered cause is styled The State of Texas v. Daniel

Vadnais, Cause Number CR-13-0651 in the 22nd Judicial District Court of Hays County,

Texas. Appellant was sentenced on August 13, 2014.

II.

Appellant was convicted on one count of Fraudulent Use or Possession of

Identifying Information. Punishment was assessed at ten (10) years imprisonment.

III.

Appellant’s notice of appeal was filed on August 28, 2014 and a motion for new

trial was filed on September 11, 2014. The clerk’s record and reporter’s record were

filed on December 11, 2014. The due date for the brief is Thursday, January 15, 2015.

IV.

This is Appellant’s first motion for extension of time to file his brief. Appellant

respectfully requests a forty-five day extension of time to file the brief, which would

make such brief due on Monday, March 2, 2015.

V.

The undersigned attorney has been unable to complete the brief due to lack of

time. The Reporter’s record was filed last month and counsel’s workload has been such

that he has not been able to devote sufficient time to complete the brief. He asks that this

extension be granted so that he may effectively represent Appellant and so that justice

may be done in this case.

Respectfully Submitted,

_/s/_Dal Ruggles_________________ DAL RUGGLES Attorney at Law 1103 Nueces St. Austin, Texas 78701 Phone: (512) 477-7991 Facsimile: (512) 477-3580 SBN: 24041834 Email: dal@ruggleslaw.com

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Dal Ruggles, hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing

Appellant’s First Motion for Extension of Time to Brief was e-served to Ms. Kathleen

Magee Arnold of the Hays County District Attorney's Office on this the 15th day of

January, 2015.

_/s/_Dal Ruggles____________ DAL RUGGLES

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Daniel Vadnais v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniel-vadnais-v-state-texapp-2015.